There is a standard for nose lifting prices which is more reasonable when compared to nose fillers

Hello, I'm the director of the Pang Pang Clinic.

“Which is better, nose fillers or nose lift?”

This is one of the most common questions asked by people who are concerned about correcting their nose.

In particular, many people are wondering which one is more reasonable in terms of cost.

There are many cases where you simply look at the initial cost to make a decision and then regret it later.

In fact, since the cost structure of the two procedures themselves is different, it is difficult to make a proper judgment based on a simple price comparison.

Today, I'm going to summarize how the two procedures should be compared.

Nose fillers and nasal lift, the cost structure itself is different

A nose filler is a method of injecting ingredients such as hyaluronic acid into the nose area to create a sense of volume.

The advantage is that the procedure is relatively simple and changes can be detected immediately.

The initial cost is also relatively low compared to nasal lift.

Nasolifting, on the other hand, has a different cost structure itself.

The initial cost is higher than that of fillers, but the maintenance period is longer, which often increases the number of retreatments.

Nose fillers usually last between 6 months and 1 year, while nasal silifting often lasts longer.

So if you get fillers repeatedly once or twice a year

On a 2 to 3 year basis, the cumulative cost may be similar to or even higher than nasal lift.

Because of this, when comparing the two procedures, we don't just look at the initial cost

A more realistic comparison is possible by considering the re-treatment cycle, maintenance period, and desired correction range together.

Whichever method you choose, it's important to first understand the cost structure that fits your treatment goals and lifestyle.

Nose lifting should be judged by the scope and holding power of correction rather than the initial cost

Nasal lifting is a method of physically fixing and towing nasal tissue using a thread.

It's more like a concept that doesn't just fill the volume like a filler, but holds the tissue itself in the desired position.

The main difference is that there is almost no spread.

Since the thread fixes the tissue, it is relatively rare for it to spread sideways like a filler.

Also, the bridge of the nose, nose ball, and tip of the nose can be corrected in different ways meritsThis is it.

Fillers are effective at adding or complementing volume, but they have limitations when it comes to subtly altering the shape itself.

Nose lifting, on the other hand, can adjust the position and angle in mm increments to correct the feeling of narrowing the nose ball or adjust the direction of the tip of the nose

More detailed designs, such as improving the bridge of the nose, are possible.

When designing a nose lift, skin type, facial proportions, and current nose shape must be considered together.

This is because if it is not in harmony with the overall proportions of the face, only the nose may appear prominent or give an unnatural impression.

In particular, designing the length of the throat, the distance between the eyes and nose, and the ratio of the lower back can lead to more natural results.

Since the nose is the area located at the center of the face, it is important not only to look at individual parts, but to approach the entire face within balance.

If this is the case, nasal lift may make more sense

The summary is as follows:

If you've been treated with fillers several times, it may be time to consider nasal lift.

This is because if fillers accumulate repeatedly, subsequent correction may be difficult due to tissue changes.

Also, when you want to correct the shape of a specific area, such as the cheek or tip of the nose, nose lift is often more suitable than fillers.

Fillers are effective at creating volume, but they have limitations in precisely altering the shape itself.

Conversely, when the entire nose is low and the volume itself is insufficient, or

If you want to experience changes in a relatively simple way, fillers may be a better choice.

In the end, which method makes more sense is the current nasal condition, desired correction range, and expectations for the maintenance period

It depends on the degree of burden associated with the re-procedure.

A more accurate judgment is possible by comprehensively checking the thickness and elasticity of the skin, facial ratio, and the current shape of the nose.

In fact, there are many cases where people feel disappointed after making a decision without fully checking this part during the consultation process.

When comparing costs, it is better to consider the maintenance period and frequency of retreatments rather than a simple initial price.

Also, be sure to keep in mind that the treatments that can be selected may vary depending on where the desired correction is.

That may be a more reasonable selection criterion.

Thank you